When comparing the environmental impact of plastic lockers versus wood lockers, it's essential to consider various aspects of their lifecycle, including raw material sourcing, manufacturing, use, and end-of-life disposal. Both materials have their pros and cons regarding sustainability:  

Plastic (ABS) Lockers:  

Raw Materials: Plastic swimming pool lockers are derived from petrochemicals, which are non-renewable resources. The extraction and processing of these resources contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and environmental degradation. 

Manufacturing: Plastic storage cabinets production can be energy-intensive and may release pollutants if not managed responsibly. However, modern manufacturing processes aim to reduce waste and energy consumption. 

Recyclability: Many types of plastic, including ABS, are recyclable, though recycling rates vary widely. Recycled plastic can be used to make new products, reducing waste. However, not all plastic waste ends up being recycled, leading to pollution issues, especially in oceans. 

Longevity: Plastic lockers' durability means they may need replacing less frequently, which can be seen as a positive environmental aspect since it reduces the need for frequent manufacturing and disposal. 

Wooden Lockers:  

Renewability: Wood is a natural and renewable resource when sourced from sustainably managed forests. Sustainable forestry practices ensure trees are harvested at a rate that allows for regeneration, minimizing negative environmental impacts. 

Carbon Storage: Trees absorb carbon dioxide as they grow, storing carbon within the wood. Using wood products can thus be seen as a way of sequestering carbon, although emissions from logging, transportation, and processing must also be considered. 

Manufacturing: The production of wooden lockers tends to have lower energy requirements compared to plastic. However, the use of chemicals for treatment and preservation can be an environmental concern. 

Biodegradability/Compostability: At the end of their life, wooden lockers can be more easily composted or biodegraded than plastic, reducing waste in landfills and the environment. 

Conclusion: Both plastic and wood lockers have environmental implications. Wood lockers have the advantage of being a renewable resource and potentially storing carbon, but their sustainability heavily depends on responsible sourcing practices. 

Plastic lockers offer durability and recyclability but are derived from non-renewable sources and can pose pollution problems if not properly disposed of or recycled. Choosing the more environmentally friendly option would involve considering factors like the source of the materials, manufacturing processes, product longevity, and end-of-life disposal methods. Additionally, exploring options for recycled plastic lockers or certified sustainable wood sources can mitigate some of these environmental concerns.